Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Martha Matoula vs Rasheeda Mcadoo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Matoula vs Mcadoo analysis and find out who is favored!
Martha Matoula vs Rasheeda Mcadoo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Matoula 0 - 0 Mcadoo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Matoula has won 39.29% of points on their second serve, while Mcadoo has won 45.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Matoula, in recent form, has won 57.68% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mcadoo has won 55.45%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.3% and 37.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Matoula has saved 45.83% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mcadoo has saved 57.42% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Matoula has won 49.21% of matches played (W/L 31/ 32), with Mcadoo winning 56.6% (W/L 30/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Matoula has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 95/ 62), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8). Mcadoo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 73/ 68), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 65/ 64).
- Player level: In the last year, Matoula has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.12% of matches (W/L 28/ 29), where as Mcadoo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.6% of matches (W/L 30/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Matoula has played against opponents with an average rank of 232.83 while Mcadoo has played against players with an average rank of 187.43.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Matoula has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mcadoo has won 52% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Matoula has converted 49.61% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mcadoo has converted 46.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
332
Rank
305
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
569
Rank
549
High
28
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
57% (143-110)
Career Total W/L
51% (147-143)
13% (2-14)
YTD W/L
54% (15-13)
$2,930
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Martha Matoula | Rasheeda Mcadoo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 13% (2/14) | 54% (15/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 26% (10/29) | 53% (36/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 41% (145/213) | 53% (336/301) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 56% (5/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 15% (2/11) | 53% (10/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 8 | 116 |
| DFs per game | 0.36 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 91 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:57 | 1:51:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 176.75 | 135.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (687/1163) | 54% (996/1829) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (371/687) | 68% (677/996) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 39% (187/476) | 46% (383/833) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (64/129) | 46% (96/208) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (522/1154) | 44% (809/1842) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 8% (1/12) | 54% (15/13) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 13% (2/16) | 54% (15/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 17% (1/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 14% (1/7) | 50% (6/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 40% (5/2) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 60% (5/3) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (11/0) | 21% (14/3) |
Martha Matoula Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Elvina Kalieva
Player
Martha Matoula
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pia Lovric
Player
Martha Matoula
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Martha Matoula
71%
(
73 of
103)
1st Serve %
58%
(
74 of
128)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
62 of
128)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Martha Matoula
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martha Matoula
Player
Martina Genis Salas
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
14
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
7 of
37)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carmen Andreea Herea
Player
Martha Matoula
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
53%
(
37 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
47 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
5-7 6-1 10-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martha Matoula
Player
Alena Kasatkina
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ylona-Georgiana Ghioroaie
Player
Martha Matoula
45%
(
33 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Korokozidi
Player
Martha Matoula
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Martha Matoula
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
-
Aces
-
12
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
29 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Rasheeda Mcadoo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
76)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Anastasiia Gureva
69%
(
81 of
118)
1st Serve %
69%
(
96 of
139)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
9
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
62 of
96)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
40 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
55 of
139)
133
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Panna Bartha
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
91
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Emily Webley-Smith
45%
(
20 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pia Lovric
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
79%
(
57 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martina Okalova
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
76%
(
68 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
0
Aces
18
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
48 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Berta Bonardi
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexandra Bozovic
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
96)
2
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
4
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Shannon Lam
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Isabella Aguiar
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Matoula Vs Mcadoo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
